Artificial Intelligence – Part II
[Editor’s Note: Normally, we do not replicate the prefaces to the newsletters on the website; often they do not pertain at all to the article at hand. This issue must stand as an exception. Other than the text immediately following, it’s important to add here that the article below was not edited, though several spots would have garnered the editing pencil if I had produced this piece myself, nor did I add anything to it. We felt this experiment should stand as created, to document the state of the technology. The following foreword, however, opened the message on 4 December 2023:
“News articles abounded in the past week about the first anniversary of the release of ChatGPT to the public. The program, crafted by OpenAI, is an artificial intelligence sandbox that can find information, write articles, create code, and shoot the breeze. Shortly after it was unleashed on the world at large, we ran an experiment to see how well the program could write an article for the newsletter. You can read that issue by pointing your browser: here. I figured it was a good time to check in on the state of our future robot overlords. The following issue is Part II of this series on Artificial Intelligence.
The premise of the experiment remains the same as in 2022. Beyond this opening introduction, nothing is written by me or any other human, nor did I edit any of the text. Further, the imagery is also created by AI. Last year, the logo was produced by a program called NightCafe. At the time, it was the best at taking an image that already existed at making something new based on it. NightCafe’s aspect ratios do not seem to currently allow the proper sizing required for the newsletter’s logo, so we switched the production of the banner to Midjourney, the same program that produced last year’s in-body imagery. Since 2022, Midjourney has taken monumental leaps in the customizations one can make on images. Other than behind-the-scenes tinkering, can you see a difference between last year’s images and the ones in this article? Just as it was a year ago, most AI image programs remain awful at generating words as prompted (they are, perhaps, designed to do this). The banner above was supposed to read “The Mountains Are Calling.”
The similarities between last year’s ChatGPT article on mountains and this year’s are interesting. I expected the articles it wrote to feature more distinctions, though there are a few. What do you think about the ability of the program in 2023? How surprised are you when you compare and contrast the two? Let me know what you think via email.
Perhaps we’ll check in again in 2024, as long as the singularity has not yet occurred. For now, here’s Part II, where I asked ChatGPT to write an article about mountains:”]